Triple
T34382242
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | MB Doctrine foreign policy |
E882467
|
entity |
| Predicate | promotesAgreementType |
P38198
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Free Trade Agreement |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Free Trade Agreement | Statement: [MB Doctrine foreign policy, promotesAgreementType, Free Trade Agreement]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: promotesAgreementType Context triple: [MB Doctrine foreign policy, promotesAgreementType, Free Trade Agreement]
-
A.
hasTypeOfAgreement
chosen
Indicates that one entity is associated with, or governed by, a specific category or type of agreement.
-
B.
requiresAgreementWith
Indicates that one entity’s action, decision, or validity is contingent upon obtaining consent or formal agreement from another specified entity.
-
C.
formedByAgreementWith
Indicates that something comes into existence or is established as a direct result of a formal agreement between parties.
-
D.
confirmedAgreementBetween
Indicates that a previously proposed agreement between two or more parties has been formally verified, accepted, and is now recognized as valid.
-
E.
basedOnAgreementWith
Indicates that something exists, is done, or is determined on the basis of a prior agreement or accord between the involved parties.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349c0219881909393bbbc1edc8161 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7516d5b4081908588a6feb541f355 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f74d40ebb081909daf60623e38f41d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:27 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:59 a.m.