Triple
T3437366
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Navarin Canyon |
E72484
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasManagementRelevance |
P48261
|
FINISHED |
| Object | fisheries management |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: fisheries management | Statement: [Navarin Canyon, hasManagementRelevance, fisheries management]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasManagementRelevance Context triple: [Navarin Canyon, hasManagementRelevance, fisheries management]
-
A.
hasManagement
Indicates that one entity exercises managerial authority or oversight over another entity.
-
B.
hasManagementConcern
Indicates that one entity has responsibility, authority, or involvement in overseeing, directing, or managing another entity or activity.
-
C.
hasTypeOfManagement
Indicates that an entity is associated with or operates under a specified form or style of management.
-
D.
hasManagementGoal
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific management objective or target it is intended to achieve or support.
-
E.
hasManagementPlan
Indicates that an entity is associated with a defined management plan specifying how it should be overseen, maintained, or administered.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85af50288190a854b76653deee6f |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adb9f4398c8190a75822068308037b |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:03 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adae00ad588190bef24373b58a2e1a |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:12 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69adaed74ecc8190b74dc70ab59a3e1c |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:16 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:16 p.m.