Triple
T34360297
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Polish parliamentary election, 2001 |
E881854
|
entity |
| Predicate | majorDefeatedParty |
P199563
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Solidarity Electoral Action |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Solidarity Electoral Action | Statement: [Polish parliamentary election, 2001, majorDefeatedParty, Solidarity Electoral Action]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: majorDefeatedParty Context triple: [Polish parliamentary election, 2001, majorDefeatedParty, Solidarity Electoral Action]
-
A.
defeatedPresidentialPartyOrCoalition
Indicates that one political party or coalition successfully defeated another party or coalition in a presidential election.
-
B.
defeatedIncumbentParty
Indicates that a political party won an election by defeating the party that previously held power or office.
-
C.
majorityPartyAfterElection
Indicates which political party holds the majority of seats following an election.
-
D.
leadingCandidateOfDefeatedParty
Indicates that an individual is the primary or most prominent candidate of a political party that has lost an election or contest.
-
E.
rulingPartyAfterElection
Indicates which political party holds governing power following the conclusion of an election.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349be5c9c81908dc726ae1f4c68f2 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff45793d5c81909dc503ad1f714ee2 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:32 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff41cb0e088190a6e9b03cb20e5fad |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:16 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ff45782cb88190b604811e4d724382 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:32 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:58 a.m.