Triple

T34334515
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject My love she mour’th E881107 entity
Predicate hasExpressiveTextSetting P148701 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [My love she mour’th, hasExpressiveTextSetting, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasExpressiveTextSetting
Context triple: [My love she mour’th, hasExpressiveTextSetting, true]
  • A. hasExpressiveCharacter
    Indicates that something possesses a distinctive, emotionally or stylistically expressive quality or character.
  • B. hasExpressivity
    Indicates that one entity possesses a certain level or type of expressive power, capability, or richness in representation relative to another.
  • C. hasExpressiveRole
    Indicates that an entity serves a communicative or expressive function or role in relation to another entity or context.
  • D. isExpressiveCharacter
    Indicates that a character displays emotions, intentions, or personality in a vivid, noticeable, and communicative way.
  • E. hasTypeOfTextSetting chosen
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a particular configuration or style that determines how its text is presented or formatted.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349ba96a08190b94887bae2d8ee49 completed April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd0b92f42881908cd77e3f058adcc2 completed May 7, 2026, 10 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd0a3d68d4819094d92040f7c48d7c completed May 7, 2026, 9:55 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:58 a.m.