Triple

T34330853
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject La Motte family (fictional) E881001 entity
Predicate marriedCouple P193958 FINISHED
Object Monsieur La Motte and Madame La Motte NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Monsieur La Motte and Madame La Motte | Statement: [La Motte family (fictional), marriedCouple, Monsieur La Motte and Madame La Motte]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: marriedCouple
Context triple: [La Motte family (fictional), marriedCouple, Monsieur La Motte and Madame La Motte]
  • A. marriedIn
    Indicates that two entities entered into a marital relationship at a specific place or within a particular jurisdiction.
  • B. marriedBy
    Indicates that one entity is the officiant or authority who performs and formalizes the marriage of another entity.
  • C. marriedInto
    Indicates that one entity became connected to another’s family or group through marriage, rather than by birth or prior membership.
  • D. marriedAfter
    Indicates that one marriage occurred later in time than another specified marriage.
  • E. laterMarriedIn
    Indicates that two entities became married at a later time relative to a previously referenced event or marital status.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349ba96a08190b94887bae2d8ee49 completed April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd5bf69acc819092a01e4259785dc3 completed May 8, 2026, 3:43 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd59b3f4ac8190a7f9dd3142da6e09 completed May 8, 2026, 3:34 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fd5bf49288819098a12202411cba4f completed May 8, 2026, 3:43 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:58 a.m.