Triple

T3432657
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lourdes E72373 entity
Predicate isCritiqueOf P3619 FINISHED
Object Catholic pilgrimage practices LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Catholic pilgrimage practices | Statement: [Lourdes, isCritiqueOf, Catholic pilgrimage practices]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isCritiqueOf
Context triple: [Lourdes, isCritiqueOf, Catholic pilgrimage practices]
  • A. aimsToCritique
    Indicates an intention to analyze and point out faults, limitations, or weaknesses in something.
  • B. criticizesSource
    Indicates that one entity expresses disapproval of, or negative judgment about, the content, behavior, or credibility of another entity that is treated as a source.
  • C. hasCriticism chosen
    Indicates that one entity expresses disapproval, objection, or negative evaluation directed toward another entity.
  • D. criticizedFor
    Indicates that one entity expresses disapproval or negative judgment of another entity specifically because of a particular action, quality, or outcome.
  • E. hasNotableCritic
    Indicates that one entity serves as a significant or widely recognized critic of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85ae14308190bcbc25cfa0246c0b completed March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adb9c077d48190bee40795cab3e422 completed March 8, 2026, 6:02 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69adae00ad588190bef24373b58a2e1a completed March 8, 2026, 5:12 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:15 p.m.