Triple

T34324389
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject HD 204075 E880826 entity
Predicate hasSpectralTypeComponentA P196297 FINISHED
Object G8II LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: G8II | Statement: [HD 204075, hasSpectralTypeComponentA, G8II]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSpectralTypeComponentA
Context triple: [HD 204075, hasSpectralTypeComponentA, G8II]
  • A. hasSpectralTypeRange
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specified range of spectral types rather than a single, discrete spectral classification.
  • B. hasSpectroscopicBinaryType
    Indicates that an entity is classified as a spectroscopic binary of a specific type, based on characteristics observed in its spectrum.
  • C. spectralTypeACharacteristic
    Indicates that an entity has a characteristic or property associated with spectral type A (e.g., typical of A-type spectra).
  • D. spectralTypeOfCompanion
    Indicates the spectral classification assigned to a companion object in a system, describing the type of its electromagnetic spectrum.
  • E. spectralTypesPresent
    Indicates that certain spectral types are present or occur within a given context or set of entities.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349b9cd508190a996a616903b3e6d completed April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe1fd637c08190aa95cd2478c278cb completed May 8, 2026, 5:39 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe19344bb481909b5e2144155e4add completed May 8, 2026, 5:11 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fe1fd58ad8819093d3d705e8521014 completed May 8, 2026, 5:39 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:58 a.m.