Triple

T34288583
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Houris E879812 entity
Predicate interpretationRange P195867 FINISHED
Object literal interpretation LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: literal interpretation | Statement: [Houris, interpretationRange, literal interpretation]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: interpretationRange
Context triple: [Houris, interpretationRange, literal interpretation]
  • A. rangeOf
    Indicates that one entity specifies the set of possible values (range) that another entity’s outputs or properties can take.
  • B. rangeDescription
    Indicates the span or interval of values, positions, or extents over which something applies or is valid.
  • C. coreRange
    Indicates the primary spatial or temporal extent within which an entity, phenomenon, or relationship is predominantly present or valid.
  • D. introducedRange
    Indicates that an entity has brought a particular range (such as a span, interval, or set of values) into existence, use, or consideration.
  • E. configurationRange
    Indicates the span or limits of values or settings that a configuration can take or is defined over.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349b6df1c81908e5e5b6c2ab6409b completed April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fdec5ffe088190ac5505f26c6cff18 completed May 8, 2026, 2 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fdeae15f1c81908fc63fbc1b028d2e completed May 8, 2026, 1:53 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fdec5f0420819087c0230ad384c4ba completed May 8, 2026, 1:59 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:57 a.m.