Triple
T34280532
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bradwell v. Illinois |
E879577
|
entity |
| Predicate | concurringOpinionNotableFor |
P178738
|
FINISHED |
| Object | emphasis on traditional gender roles and women’s domestic sphere |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: emphasis on traditional gender roles and women’s domestic sphere | Statement: [Bradwell v. Illinois, concurringOpinionNotableFor, emphasis on traditional gender roles and women’s domestic sphere]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: concurringOpinionNotableFor Context triple: [Bradwell v. Illinois, concurringOpinionNotableFor, emphasis on traditional gender roles and women’s domestic sphere]
-
A.
concurringJustice
Indicates that a justice agrees with the court’s judgment or outcome but writes or joins a separate concurring opinion expressing different or additional reasoning.
-
B.
concurringJustices
Indicates that the specified justices agreed with the court’s judgment or reasoning in the same case, typically by joining or authoring a concurring opinion.
-
C.
hasConcurringJustice
Indicates that a judicial decision is associated with a justice who wrote or joined a concurring opinion.
-
D.
dissentingJustice
Indicates that a particular justice disagrees with the majority opinion or decision in a legal case.
-
E.
hasDissentingOpinions
Indicates that one or more entities hold opinions that disagree with or oppose a prevailing, majority, or authoritative view in a given context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349b5f6648190b9420d94a4cd16e0 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f713bfdc148190a249a7874320bab8 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:22 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7127884388190884f23d181a65d19 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:16 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f7135fa2988190a20a94cfe616d754 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:20 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:57 a.m.