Triple
T34275061
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ludwig II. von Ungarn und Böhmen |
E879428
|
entity |
| Predicate | NachfolgerAlsKönigVonUngarn |
P65697
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ferdinand I. (HRR) |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ferdinand I. (HRR) | Statement: [Ludwig II. von Ungarn und Böhmen, NachfolgerAlsKönigVonUngarn, Ferdinand I. (HRR)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: NachfolgerAlsKönigVonUngarn Context triple: [Ludwig II. von Ungarn und Böhmen, NachfolgerAlsKönigVonUngarn, Ferdinand I. (HRR)]
-
A.
successorAsKingOfHungary
chosen
Indicates that one person became the next king of Hungary following another person in the royal succession.
-
B.
predecessorAsKingOfHungary
Indicates that one person previously held the position of King of Hungary immediately before another person.
-
C.
reignAsKingOfHungaryEnd
Indicates the time or event at which an entity’s reign as King of Hungary comes to an end.
-
D.
successorAsDukeOfAustria
Indicates that one entity became the next holder of the title Duke of Austria after another entity.
-
E.
successorAsKingOfBohemia
Indicates that one person became the next king of Bohemia after another person.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349b5f6648190b9420d94a4cd16e0 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f71362f1448190985a80ce7af475cb |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:20 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7127884388190884f23d181a65d19 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:16 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:56 a.m.