Triple
T34260039
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Negros biogeographic region |
E879000
|
entity |
| Predicate | currentVegetationTrend |
P199297
|
FINISHED |
| Object | forest cover greatly reduced |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: forest cover greatly reduced | Statement: [Negros biogeographic region, currentVegetationTrend, forest cover greatly reduced]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: currentVegetationTrend Context triple: [Negros biogeographic region, currentVegetationTrend, forest cover greatly reduced]
-
A.
vegetationType
Indicates the specific kind or category of plant cover or flora that characterizes a given area or environment.
-
B.
vegetationCoverage
Indicates the extent or proportion of an area that is covered by vegetation.
-
C.
vegetation
Indicates that an area or object is covered with, contains, or is characterized by plant life.
-
D.
plantingTrend
Indicates a pattern or change over time in how frequently or extensively planting activities occur.
-
E.
vegetationRegrowthObserved
Indicates that the renewal or increase of plant cover has been detected following a prior disturbance or reduction.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349b421cc8190b4b4655e1d612548 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff2d22ffb48190ae58ddf3c7e02869 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 12:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff2ac2e1c4819096cc64e94aef2ff0 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 12:38 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ff2d21f0a48190ad2ef5901cb07d93 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 12:48 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:56 a.m.