Triple
T34257357
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | PlusBus scheme |
E878927
|
entity |
| Predicate | validWith |
P9768
|
FINISHED |
| Object | train tickets to participating towns and cities |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: train tickets to participating towns and cities | Statement: [PlusBus scheme, validWith, train tickets to participating towns and cities]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: validWith Context triple: [PlusBus scheme, validWith, train tickets to participating towns and cities]
-
A.
validIn
chosen
Indicates that a given entity, statement, or condition is applicable, correct, or legally/semantically acceptable within a specified context, scope, or domain.
-
B.
validityType
Indicates the specific kind or category of validity that characterizes how or under what conditions something is considered valid.
-
C.
hasValidity
Indicates that something possesses a period or condition during which it is considered legally, logically, or functionally acceptable or in force.
-
D.
supportsValidationOf
Indicates that one entity provides the mechanisms or conditions necessary for another entity to be checked or verified for correctness or compliance.
-
E.
upholdsValidityOf
Indicates that one entity confirms, supports, or maintains the correctness and legitimacy of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349b421cc8190b4b4655e1d612548 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f71362f1448190985a80ce7af475cb |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:20 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7127884388190884f23d181a65d19 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:16 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:56 a.m.