Triple

T34253604
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject French 16th Division E878811 entity
Predicate usedAttachedUnitsFrom P196336 FINISHED
Object United States NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States | Statement: [French 16th Division, usedAttachedUnitsFrom, United States]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedAttachedUnitsFrom
Context triple: [French 16th Division, usedAttachedUnitsFrom, United States]
  • A. hasUnitsFrom
    Indicates that one entity derives, adopts, or uses its measurement units from another specified source entity.
  • B. associatedWithUnit
    Indicates that one entity has a connection, linkage, or affiliation with a particular unit (such as a division, department, or organizational subunit).
  • C. associatedUnitType
    Indicates that one entity is linked to or characterized by a particular type or category of unit.
  • D. isPeripheralUnitOf
    Indicates that one unit functions as a subsidiary or outer component belonging to, and typically supporting, a larger central unit.
  • E. attachedTo
    Indicates that one entity is physically or logically fastened, connected, or joined to another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349b421cc8190b4b4655e1d612548 completed April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe21b0cba48190b56c39e9f1c0eafa completed May 8, 2026, 5:47 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe204576848190aecf204e2adba5dc completed May 8, 2026, 5:41 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fe21afdc4c8190913ac4b55a9a5f52 completed May 8, 2026, 5:47 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:56 a.m.