Triple

T34240734
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cnicht E878455 entity
Predicate hasPhotogenicProfileFrom P181796 FINISHED
Object Porthmadog NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Porthmadog | Statement: [Cnicht, hasPhotogenicProfileFrom, Porthmadog]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPhotogenicProfileFrom
Context triple: [Cnicht, hasPhotogenicProfileFrom, Porthmadog]
  • A. hasPhotoOn
    Indicates that one entity has an associated photograph stored, displayed, or linked on another entity (such as a platform, page, or medium).
  • B. hasPhotographBy
    Indicates that an entity is depicted in or associated with a photograph that was created or taken by a specified photographer.
  • C. hasPhotogenicFeature
    Indicates that an entity possesses a visual characteristic or attribute that is especially attractive or appealing when photographed.
  • D. hasPhotograph
    Indicates that one entity possesses, includes, or is associated with a photograph depicting or representing another entity.
  • E. hasPhotographAt
    Indicates that a photograph depicting an entity was taken or exists at a specific location or event.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349b22d8c819096b22df268382aa9 completed April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7824dc3f0819092a5102895b4a478 completed May 3, 2026, 5:13 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f780fc5ed88190b7200ee5a29940af completed May 3, 2026, 5:08 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f7817c79e081908e685c48165e086b completed May 3, 2026, 5:10 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:56 a.m.