Triple

T34232061
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Olivier Marchal E878221 entity
Predicate hasWorkedAsPoliceOfficerIn P17879 FINISHED
Object France NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: France | Statement: [Olivier Marchal, hasWorkedAsPoliceOfficerIn, France]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasWorkedAsPoliceOfficerIn
Context triple: [Olivier Marchal, hasWorkedAsPoliceOfficerIn, France]
  • A. isLawEnforcement
    Indicates that an entity serves in an official capacity to enforce laws, maintain public order, and uphold legal regulations.
  • B. hasWorkedIn chosen
    Indicates that a person has been employed or has performed work within a particular organization, location, or domain for some period of time.
  • C. hasLawEnforcementHistory
    Indicates that an entity has a record of past involvement with law enforcement, such as prior incidents, investigations, or offenses.
  • D. hasPolicePartner
    Indicates that one entity has another entity as its partner in a police or law-enforcement context.
  • E. isPartOfLawEnforcementSystem
    Indicates that an entity belongs to, operates within, or functionally contributes to a law enforcement system or framework.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349b22d8c819096b22df268382aa9 completed April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe189fec148190aeef51b417ba15b0 completed May 8, 2026, 5:08 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe17285b0881908de7569d8dbd20bd completed May 8, 2026, 5:02 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:56 a.m.