Triple
T34230980
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Disputationes metaphysicae |
E878191
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | scholastic philosophical work |
C28220
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: scholastic philosophical work Context triple: [Disputationes metaphysicae, instanceOf, scholastic philosophical work]
-
A.
philosophical prose work
A philosophical prose work is a written composition that explores fundamental questions about existence, knowledge, values, reason, and meaning through structured argumentation and reflective narrative rather than through verse or empirical analysis.
-
B.
philosophical work part
A philosophical work part is a distinct section or component of a philosophical text (such as a chapter, argument, or subsection) that contributes to the development of its overall ideas or theses.
-
C.
scholastic treatise
chosen
A scholastic treatise is a systematically structured, often dialectical written work that rigorously analyzes theological, philosophical, or logical questions using formal argumentation and authoritative sources.
-
D.
Scholastic philosopher
A scholastic philosopher is a medieval or early modern thinker who employs rigorous logical analysis, often within a Christian theological framework, to systematically reconcile faith and reason using the methods of the schools (scholae).
-
E.
work of continental philosophy
A work of continental philosophy is a text that engages critically and often historically with questions of meaning, subjectivity, power, and culture, typically using interpretive, phenomenological, or dialectical methods rather than formal analytic argumentation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349b16d0481908754e3069f05e0c1 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:56 a.m.