Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Remonstrants | Statement: [Counter-Remonstrants, consideredOpponentsAs, Remonstrants]

Target entity: Remonstrants
Context triple: [Counter-Remonstrants, consideredOpponentsAs, Remonstrants]

• A. Remonstrants chosen
  The Remonstrants were a 17th-century Dutch Protestant movement that opposed strict Calvinist predestination by advocating a more free-will-oriented, Arminian theology.
• B. Counter-Remonstrants
  The Counter-Remonstrants were a strict Calvinist faction in the Dutch Republic that opposed the more liberal Arminian Remonstrants in the early 17th-century religious and political conflicts.
• C. Five Articles of the Remonstrance
  The Five Articles of the Remonstrance are a 1610 theological statement by Dutch Arminians that challenged strict Calvinist doctrines on predestination, grace, and perseverance, becoming a foundational text of Arminian theology.
• D. Socinians
  Socinians were a 16th–17th century Christian movement known for their rationalist theology, rejection of the Trinity, and emphasis on the moral teachings of Jesus.
• E. Pilgrim Separatists
  The Pilgrim Separatists were a group of English Protestants who broke from the Church of England and famously founded the Plymouth Colony in North America in 1620 in pursuit of religious freedom.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: consideredOpponentsAs
Context triple: [Counter-Remonstrants, consideredOpponentsAs, Remonstrants]

• A. allegedByOpponents
  Indicates that a claim or accusation is made by opponents of the subject.
• B. opponentInCase
  Indicates that two parties are on opposing sides in the same legal case or proceeding.
• C. invitedOpponents
  Indicates that one entity extended an invitation to another entity specifically in the context of being opponents, such as in a match, contest, or competitive event.
• D. opponentSupporters
  Indicates that the related entities are supporters or backers of opposing sides in a contest, conflict, or competition.
• E. hasOpposingSide
  Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with another entity that lies on the opposite or facing side relative to a reference orientation or boundary.
• F. None of above. chosen