Triple
T3421341
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pixel Fold |
E72120
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsBluetooth |
P39529
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Bluetooth 5.2 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bluetooth 5.2 | Statement: [Pixel Fold, supportsBluetooth, Bluetooth 5.2]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsBluetooth Context triple: [Pixel Fold, supportsBluetooth, Bluetooth 5.2]
-
A.
hasBluetooth
chosen
Indicates that one entity is equipped with or supports Bluetooth connectivity.
-
B.
wirelessSupportIntroduced
Indicates that support for wireless functionality was added or became available for the first time.
-
C.
deviceIndicates
Indicates that a device provides a signal, status, or output that conveys information about a condition, event, or state.
-
D.
supportsStereoPairing
Indicates that an entity is capable of being paired with another similar entity to function together as a synchronized stereo audio system.
-
E.
hasHardwareCompatibilityWith
Indicates that two hardware components or systems can operate together correctly and reliably without conflicts or incompatibilities.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85ad38e48190b7660c5118a35289 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adb950f65481908c4aad15516e7a7c |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adadfea024819094b41a13bc004bda |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:12 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:15 p.m.