Triple
T34212749
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | US–California border |
E877701
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLegalDefinitionBy |
P195603
|
FINISHED |
| Object | State of California |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: State of California | Statement: [US–California border, hasLegalDefinitionBy, State of California]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLegalDefinitionBy Context triple: [US–California border, hasLegalDefinitionBy, State of California]
-
A.
hasLegalDefinitionIn
Indicates that something possesses an official legal definition within a specified legal source, system, or jurisdiction.
-
B.
legalDefinitionCompleted
Indicates that the process of establishing or finalizing the formal legal definition of something has been completed.
-
C.
hasLegalRelevanceIn
Indicates that something is legally significant, applicable, or has consequences within a specified legal context, case, or jurisdiction.
-
D.
hasLegalSubject
Indicates that an entity serves as the legal subject (e.g., rights-holder or obligated party) in a legal relationship or context.
-
E.
hasLegalForceAs
Indicates that one thing possesses the binding legal effect or validity in the capacity or role of another specified thing.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349b0b4bc819088c1552424089ee9 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fddac4e2f48190a9301d3422658b29 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 12:44 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fdda06969c8190b5d033964ea2a690 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 12:41 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fddac42c4081908568649058e86458 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 12:44 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:55 a.m.