Triple

T3420729
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Burmese E72108 entity
Predicate writingSystemUsage P26603 FINISHED
Object used in government LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: used in government | Statement: [Burmese, writingSystemUsage, used in government]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: writingSystemUsage
Context triple: [Burmese, writingSystemUsage, used in government]
  • A. writingSystemUsedIn chosen
    Indicates that a particular writing system is employed for written communication within a given language, region, or context.
  • B. writingSystemUsedSince
    Indicates that a particular writing system has been in use starting from a specified point in time or period.
  • C. writingSystemStatus
    Indicates the current functional or sociolinguistic state of a writing system, such as whether it is actively used, obsolete, official, or endangered.
  • D. writingSystem
    Indicates that one entity is the script or system of written symbols used to represent the language or content of another entity.
  • E. writingSystemScope
    Indicates the range or extent of content, languages, or contexts to which a particular writing system applies or is used.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85ad38e48190b7660c5118a35289 completed March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adb94eb9e8819087a525df4550914b completed March 8, 2026, 6 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69adadfea024819094b41a13bc004bda completed March 8, 2026, 5:12 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:15 p.m.