Triple
T34192504
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lea Salonga (1993 album) |
E877147
|
entity |
| Predicate | duetPartnerOnWeCouldBeInLove |
P178505
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Brad Kane |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Brad Kane | Statement: [Lea Salonga (1993 album), duetPartnerOnWeCouldBeInLove, Brad Kane]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: duetPartnerOnWeCouldBeInLove Context triple: [Lea Salonga (1993 album), duetPartnerOnWeCouldBeInLove, Brad Kane]
-
A.
partnerInMusicDuoWith
Indicates that two entities are members of the same musical duo, performing together as a two-person act.
-
B.
dancePartner
Indicates that two entities are engaged in or paired together for a dance.
-
C.
partnerInQuartetWith
Indicates that two entities are members of the same quartet and are partners within that four-member group.
-
D.
partnerInLoveTeam
Indicates that two entities are teammates who are also partners in a romantic or love-based relationship.
-
E.
hasDoublesPartner
Indicates that one entity serves as the doubles partner of another in a paired or team-based activity or sport.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349af20a4819089ac24d28f2d8112 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f710aaff588190adc6cc5b7d5424cc |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:08 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f70f3c5bfc81908585f52e196dafe5 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:02 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f70fddd43c819088dee5a448c72cbe |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:05 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:55 a.m.