Triple
T34189647
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Independent Submissions Editor |
E877064
|
entity |
| Predicate | evaluatesFor |
P178504
|
FINISHED |
| Object | possible publication |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: possible publication | Statement: [Independent Submissions Editor, evaluatesFor, possible publication]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: evaluatesFor Context triple: [Independent Submissions Editor, evaluatesFor, possible publication]
-
A.
evaluatesAs
Indicates that one entity is judged, interpreted, or assessed as having a particular value, role, or classification in relation to another.
-
B.
evaluatesCondition
Indicates that an entity assesses whether a specified condition or set of conditions holds true, typically producing a boolean result.
-
C.
evaluatedInContext
Indicates that an entity (such as a statement, result, or behavior) is assessed or interpreted within a specific contextual setting or framework.
-
D.
supportsEvaluation
Indicates that one entity provides the necessary functionality, resources, or conditions for another entity to be assessed, tested, or evaluated.
-
E.
evaluatesSource
Indicates that an entity assesses or judges the quality, reliability, or relevance of a given source.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349af20a4819089ac24d28f2d8112 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f710aaff588190adc6cc5b7d5424cc |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:08 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f70f3c5bfc81908585f52e196dafe5 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:02 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f70fddd43c819088dee5a448c72cbe |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:05 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:55 a.m.