Triple
T3416983
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ACM committees |
E72031
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDecisionMakingRole |
P8542
|
FINISHED |
| Object | advisory |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: advisory | Statement: [ACM committees, hasDecisionMakingRole, advisory]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDecisionMakingRole Context triple: [ACM committees, hasDecisionMakingRole, advisory]
-
A.
hasDecisionMakingPower
Indicates that one entity possesses the authority or ability to make decisions that affect another entity or a given context.
-
B.
hasDecisionMaker
Indicates that one entity serves as the decision-making authority or agent for another entity.
-
C.
decisionMakingRole
chosen
Indicates that an entity holds responsibility or authority in making decisions for or on behalf of another entity or group.
-
D.
makesDecisionBy
Indicates that one entity determines or chooses an outcome, course of action, or judgment by means of another entity, method, or process.
-
E.
hasDecisionMakingStyle
Indicates that an entity possesses or exhibits a particular way or pattern of making decisions.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85ad38e48190b7660c5118a35289 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adb92c20fc81909b5debced20ec083 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adadfcbc38819080852c18240451c5 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:12 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:15 p.m.