Triple
T34164729
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ibajay |
E876376
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPlanningConcern |
P72002
|
FINISHED |
| Object | coastal resource management |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: coastal resource management | Statement: [Ibajay, hasPlanningConcern, coastal resource management]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPlanningConcern Context triple: [Ibajay, hasPlanningConcern, coastal resource management]
-
A.
hasPlanningIssue
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with a problem, concern, or complication related to planning or plan formulation.
-
B.
hasPlanningConcept
Indicates that an entity is associated with, defined by, or governed by a particular planning-related concept or framework.
-
C.
hasPlanningStatus
Indicates that an entity is associated with a particular stage, condition, or outcome in a planning or approval process.
-
D.
hasPlanningSignificance
Indicates that something holds importance or relevance for planning, decision-making, or future organizational activities.
-
E.
hasPlanningConstraint
Indicates that there is a rule, limitation, or condition that must be considered when planning or scheduling an activity, resource, or process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349ac987481908a8e6053f665bc8b |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd474b7e788190a9bb9b542d878f60 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 2:15 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd46d8b2f0819099d92d72c902f60e |
completed | May 8, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:54 a.m.