Triple

T3414037
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject PADL E71964 entity
Predicate languageParadigm P49316 FINISHED
Object declarative programming paradigm LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: declarative programming paradigm | Statement: [PADL, languageParadigm, declarative programming paradigm]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: languageParadigm
Context triple: [PADL, languageParadigm, declarative programming paradigm]
  • A. languageOfProgramming
    Indicates that one entity is a programming language used to implement, develop, or script the other entity.
  • B. programmingLanguage
    Indicates that one entity is a programming language used to create, control, or interact with the other entity.
  • C. languageOfCode
    Indicates that a programming code artifact is written in, or uses, a particular programming language.
  • D. programmingLanguageFamily
    Indicates that one programming language belongs to, or is categorized under, the family or lineage of another programming language.
  • E. languageNeutral
    Indicates that the relationship or action is independent of any specific natural language, applying uniformly across different linguistic contexts.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85ac312481909e7027ced1456a9f completed March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adb927e8d081908a5ab283da93beb2 completed March 8, 2026, 6 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69adadfcbc38819080852c18240451c5 completed March 8, 2026, 5:12 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69adb23d23088190aeafe1379eae2eaa completed March 8, 2026, 5:30 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:15 p.m.