Triple
T34130900
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Central Government in Jharkhand |
E875420
|
entity |
| Predicate | interactsWithStateThrough |
P69025
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Inter-State Council |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Inter-State Council | Statement: [Central Government in Jharkhand, interactsWithStateThrough, Inter-State Council]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: interactsWithStateThrough Context triple: [Central Government in Jharkhand, interactsWithStateThrough, Inter-State Council]
-
A.
cooperatesWithStateIn
chosen
Indicates that an entity works jointly with a state or government body in pursuing shared goals, activities, or operations.
-
B.
passesThroughState
Indicates that something (such as a route, path, or process) traverses or goes through a particular state or region during its course.
-
C.
sharedBetweenState
Indicates that something is jointly possessed, controlled, or utilized by multiple states or state-level entities.
-
D.
appliedToStatesThrough
Indicates that something (such as a rule, policy, or process) is implemented or enforced by means of, or via the mediation of, particular states.
-
E.
associatedState
Indicates that one entity is linked or connected to a particular state, condition, or status of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349aa33848190a2e6c5e4533c8444 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fddac4e2f48190a9301d3422658b29 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 12:44 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fdda06969c8190b5d033964ea2a690 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 12:41 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:53 a.m.