Triple
T34128362
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Savoyard Vicar |
E875353
|
entity |
| Predicate | methodOfArgument |
P48759
|
FINISHED |
| Object | appeal to inner sentiment |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: appeal to inner sentiment | Statement: [Savoyard Vicar, methodOfArgument, appeal to inner sentiment]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: methodOfArgument Context triple: [Savoyard Vicar, methodOfArgument, appeal to inner sentiment]
-
A.
argumentOf
Indicates that one entity functions as an argument (participant or operand) in relation to another entity, such as a predicate, event, or expression.
-
B.
argumentType
Indicates that one entity serves as a specific semantic or syntactic argument role (such as subject, object, or complement) in relation to another entity or event.
-
C.
method
Indicates the technique, procedure, or process used by an entity to perform an action or achieve a result.
-
D.
argumentStructure
Indicates how the participants or arguments of an event or action are organized and related to the predicate in a linguistic or logical structure.
-
E.
usedInArgumentFor
chosen
Indicates that something (such as a statement, piece of evidence, or concept) is employed as support within an argument advocating for a particular claim or position.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349aa33848190a2e6c5e4533c8444 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f727bde8f88190ad746ca515134ca1 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:47 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f72739c30c81908642eef3feb3afcf |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:45 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:53 a.m.