Triple

T34114799
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mendoza wine region E874941 entity
Predicate hasKeyGrapeVariety P162513 FINISHED
Object Malbec NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Malbec | Statement: [Mendoza wine region, hasKeyGrapeVariety, Malbec]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasKeyGrapeVariety
Context triple: [Mendoza wine region, hasKeyGrapeVariety, Malbec]
  • A. alsoUsesGrapeVariety
    Indicates that one entity, in addition to another, makes use of the same grape variety in its composition or production.
  • B. grapeVarietyType
    Indicates the specific type or classification of a grape variety used or referred to in a given context.
  • C. grapeVarietal chosen
    Indicates that one entity is a specific type or variety of grape used in wine or grape production in relation to another entity.
  • D. linkedGrapeVariety
    Indicates that there is an established relationship or association between one grape variety and another (or related grape variety entity).
  • E. grapeVarietyWorkedWith
    Indicates that an entity (typically a person, organization, or producer) has worked with or handled a particular grape variety in some professional or practical capacity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349a9271c81909576994c9ef7b179 completed April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fbc9d1dba881908c399b8e1dc13ce2 completed May 6, 2026, 11:08 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fbc8ec03ac8190a757563f96fab283 completed May 6, 2026, 11:04 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:53 a.m.