Triple
T34107305
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Amhara National Democratic Movement |
E874739
|
entity |
| Predicate | statusWithinEPRDF |
P199625
|
FINISHED |
| Object | constituent party |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: constituent party | Statement: [Amhara National Democratic Movement, statusWithinEPRDF, constituent party]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: statusWithinEPRDF Context triple: [Amhara National Democratic Movement, statusWithinEPRDF, constituent party]
-
A.
statusInRDF11
Indicates the status or standing of something within the context of RDF 1.1 (e.g., its approval, stability, or specification state in that version of RDF).
-
B.
statusWithinRepertoire
Indicates that a particular status or state is included as part of an entity’s defined repertoire of possible statuses.
-
C.
ontologyStatus
Indicates the current state or condition of an entity within an ontology lifecycle (e.g., proposed, active, deprecated, or obsolete).
-
D.
statusWithinSeries
Indicates the position or rank that something holds within an ordered series or sequence.
-
E.
statusInNESSIE
Indicates that an entity’s current status or state is recorded or represented within the NESSIE system or framework.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349a80d4481908527317d43f5c579 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff49016dcc8190a8a43868c728b4f1 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:47 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff4891924c8190b5be340e2520e012 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:45 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ff490096388190832a90e9abbc8d81 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:47 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:53 a.m.