Triple

T340803
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hausa E6832 entity
Predicate hasGenderDistinction P12026 FINISHED
Object grammatical gender LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: grammatical gender | Statement: [Hausa, hasGenderDistinction, grammatical gender]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasGenderDistinction
Context triple: [Hausa, hasGenderDistinction, grammatical gender]
  • A. hasNumberOfGenders
    Indicates the relationship that specifies how many distinct genders are associated with or recognized for a given entity.
  • B. hasGenderFocus
    Indicates that something is specifically concerned with, oriented toward, or primarily addressing a particular gender or gender-related issues.
  • C. hasGrammaticalGender
    Indicates that one entity assigns or possesses a specific grammatical gender in relation to another entity (such as a word, phrase, or linguistic unit).
  • D. hasGenderedTitle
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a title or form of address that is explicitly marked for a particular gender.
  • E. hasNeutralPronoun
    Indicates that an entity is referred to using a gender-neutral pronoun.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e7951ba08190960e90823b5078f3 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2eae611f88190955fbebe2b01835b completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2e95197fc8190820e8ebd0d7d27fa completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a2ea0a4c448190a8a179daa9b90645 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:13 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.