Triple
T34078179
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Common Law Division |
E873961
|
entity |
| Predicate | followsPrecedentFrom |
P132725
|
FINISHED |
| Object | High Court of Australia |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: High Court of Australia | Statement: [Common Law Division, followsPrecedentFrom, High Court of Australia]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: followsPrecedentFrom Context triple: [Common Law Division, followsPrecedentFrom, High Court of Australia]
-
A.
precedentFor
Indicates that one situation, decision, or case serves as an authoritative example or basis for deciding or interpreting another.
-
B.
usesLegalPrecedentFrom
Indicates that one legal case, decision, or argument relies on, cites, or is based upon the legal precedent established by another.
-
C.
subsequentCitationAsPrecedentFor
Indicates that one citation is used later as a precedent or authoritative basis for another citation or legal decision.
-
D.
precedentInterpreted
Indicates that one legal precedent is interpreted or understood in a particular way, often as clarified or applied in subsequent decisions or analyses.
-
E.
legalPrecedentFrom
chosen
Indicates that a legal decision, ruling, or principle is derived from, based on, or justified by an earlier legal case or authority.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349a566808190a1c63b898f33cddf |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fea1f5d8c481908dc3351dc9ecef7f |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:54 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fea06b6fe0819095bf4c1bc9809927 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:48 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:52 a.m.