Triple
T34055561
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Gospel According to Jesus |
E873344
|
entity |
| Predicate | critiquesPractice |
P82153
|
FINISHED |
| Object | reduction of the gospel to a one-time decision |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: reduction of the gospel to a one-time decision | Statement: [The Gospel According to Jesus, critiquesPractice, reduction of the gospel to a one-time decision]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: critiquesPractice Context triple: [The Gospel According to Jesus, critiquesPractice, reduction of the gospel to a one-time decision]
-
A.
critiquesConcept
Indicates that one entity analyzes, evaluates, or challenges the ideas or principles represented by another entity.
-
B.
criticizedConstruct
Indicates that one entity expressed disapproval or negative judgment about another entity’s constructed work, idea, or creation.
-
C.
usedToCritique
Indicates that something is employed as a means to analyze, evaluate, or express disapproval of something else.
-
D.
aimsToCritique
Indicates an intention to analyze and point out faults, limitations, or weaknesses in something.
-
E.
critiquesAspect
chosen
Indicates that one entity evaluates and expresses critical judgment about a particular aspect or component of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349a3ec2c8190b62da76e54231a0f |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f70b966860819089cf92927f47c5f1 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f70ac0170c819098e3b8e41d02efef |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:43 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:52 a.m.