Triple
T34045393
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tribunales Colegiados de Circuito |
E873072
|
entity |
| Predicate | integración |
P173265
|
FINISHED |
| Object | tres magistrados |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: tres magistrados | Statement: [Tribunales Colegiados de Circuito, integración, tres magistrados]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: integración Context triple: [Tribunales Colegiados de Circuito, integración, tres magistrados]
-
A.
integrates
Indicates that one entity combines or brings together another entity or set of entities into a unified, functioning whole.
-
B.
integra
chosen
Indicates that one entity is an integral or essential part of another entity, contributing fundamentally to its completeness or function.
-
C.
integralTo
Indicates that one entity is an essential, non-removable component or part of another entity, such that the whole depends on it to function or be complete.
-
D.
integratesOn
Indicates that one entity is designed to work seamlessly within, or be combined functionally with, another entity or platform.
-
E.
integralType
Indicates that one entity is an integral (whole) type of which the other is a specific instance, part, or subtype.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349a3363081909cea4c9a848cefe2 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f727bde8f88190ad746ca515134ca1 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:47 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f72739c30c81908642eef3feb3afcf |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:45 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:51 a.m.