Triple
T34022208
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Das Lakshan Parva |
E872409
|
entity |
| Predicate | day8Virtue |
P6827
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Uttam Tyag (supreme renunciation) |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Uttam Tyag (supreme renunciation) | Statement: [Das Lakshan Parva, day8Virtue, Uttam Tyag (supreme renunciation)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: day8Virtue Context triple: [Das Lakshan Parva, day8Virtue, Uttam Tyag (supreme renunciation)]
-
A.
vowedVirtue
Indicates that an entity has formally promised or committed to uphold a particular virtue or moral quality.
-
B.
virtuePraisedFor
Indicates that a particular virtue is being commended, admired, or spoken of approvingly by someone.
-
C.
virtue
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses or exemplifies a morally good quality, trait, or behavior.
-
D.
virtueIllustrated
Indicates that an action, example, or situation serves to demonstrate or make clear a particular virtue.
-
E.
virtuePromoted
Indicates that one entity actively encourages, supports, or increases the presence or practice of a particular virtue in another entity or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349a19ad88190ab586f010c804a8f |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f70b966860819089cf92927f47c5f1 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f70abe43e08190b2a30930d96247c1 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:43 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:51 a.m.