Triple
T34021365
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Aṣṭāṅga Yoga |
E872389
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasEthicalComponent |
P18695
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Yama and Niyama |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Yama and Niyama | Statement: [Aṣṭāṅga Yoga, hasEthicalComponent, Yama and Niyama]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasEthicalComponent Context triple: [Aṣṭāṅga Yoga, hasEthicalComponent, Yama and Niyama]
-
A.
hasEthicalDimension
chosen
Indicates that the relationship, action, or situation involves moral considerations, value judgments, or ethical implications.
-
B.
hasEthicalStandard
Indicates that an entity adheres to, follows, or is governed by a specified set of ethical principles or standards.
-
C.
hasEthicalText
Indicates that an entity is associated with or contains text expressing ethical principles, guidelines, or considerations.
-
D.
hasEthicalContribution
Indicates that an entity contributes positively to ethical standards, practices, or outcomes within a given context.
-
E.
hasEthicalConstraint
Indicates that an entity is subject to a specified ethical rule, limitation, or normative requirement that governs its behavior or decisions.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349a19ad88190ab586f010c804a8f |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fb6fdc7eb081908ab8475efb38c430 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 4:44 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fb5a986e588190b7a10892bd2ff44c |
completed | May 6, 2026, 3:13 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:51 a.m.