Triple

T3402075
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Stefon E71677 entity
Predicate portrayalFeature P49090 FINISHED
Object actor breaking character LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: actor breaking character | Statement: [Stefon, portrayalFeature, actor breaking character]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: portrayalFeature
Context triple: [Stefon, portrayalFeature, actor breaking character]
  • A. portrayalRecognition
    Indicates that one entity recognizes or identifies another entity as a portrayal or representation of a particular subject or character.
  • B. portrayalReceived
    Indicates that an entity has been depicted or represented by another entity, such as through an image, performance, or description.
  • C. portrayalLedTo
    Indicates that one entity’s portrayal of another caused or significantly contributed to a subsequent outcome, reaction, or state involving that other entity.
  • D. portrayedVia
    Indicates that one entity is represented, depicted, or expressed through a particular medium, method, or channel.
  • E. portraysActorAs
    Indicates that one entity depicts or represents an actor in a particular role, character, or manner.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85aac4808190a092c9cc8911f584 completed March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adb8c96d7c8190a1f9d035996f79e3 completed March 8, 2026, 5:58 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69adadfa73ac8190a163f93e88d217f8 completed March 8, 2026, 5:12 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69adb21a437c81908bca88d5e123d744 completed March 8, 2026, 5:30 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:14 p.m.