Triple

T34008896
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gambler’s Roll E872046 entity
Predicate hasSuboptimalTotal P200208 FINISHED
Object unlucky number LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: unlucky number | Statement: [Gambler’s Roll, hasSuboptimalTotal, unlucky number]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSuboptimalTotal
Context triple: [Gambler’s Roll, hasSuboptimalTotal, unlucky number]
  • A. hasOptimalPlayProperty
    Indicates that the subject possesses a characteristic or condition under which its behavior, strategy, or outcome is considered optimally effective according to defined criteria.
  • B. hasOptimalPlayResult
    Indicates that, given optimal play by all participants, a specific outcome or result is achieved in the described scenario or game.
  • C. typeOfOptimality
    Indicates that one entity specifies the particular notion or criterion of optimality that characterizes another entity’s optimal status or solution.
  • D. hasSubStandard
    Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with another entity that fails to meet defined standards or quality criteria.
  • E. hasSubranking
    Indicates that one ranking is a subordinate or nested ranking within another ranking.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349a08848819084b348d64c1879c3 completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff7ae5d088819089aa3b6360b6b749 completed May 9, 2026, 6:20 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff7a4df6488190bf60d675b36b1d6d completed May 9, 2026, 6:17 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ff7ae4bc948190a4cd21a60d091977 completed May 9, 2026, 6:20 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:51 a.m.