Triple
T33986210
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gene Hackman |
E871414
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasGivenNotablePerformanceIn |
P28040
|
FINISHED |
| Object | The French Connection |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The French Connection | Statement: [Gene Hackman, hasGivenNotablePerformanceIn, The French Connection]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasGivenNotablePerformanceIn Context triple: [Gene Hackman, hasGivenNotablePerformanceIn, The French Connection]
-
A.
hasNotablePerformanceIn
chosen
Indicates that an entity delivered a significant or distinguished performance within a specified work, event, or context.
-
B.
hasNotablePerformance
Indicates that an entity has delivered a performance that is distinguished, remarkable, or otherwise noteworthy in a particular context.
-
C.
hasGivenAcclaimedPerformance
Indicates that an entity has delivered a performance that has received significant praise or critical acclaim.
-
D.
hasNotablePerformer
Indicates that an entity features or is associated with a performer who is particularly prominent, famous, or otherwise noteworthy.
-
E.
notablePerformanceYear
Indicates the year in which an entity delivered a particularly significant or distinguished performance.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3499e964c8190b674b03f6f791b4b |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7064e906881909c3186c646145d34 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:24 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f70100ec1c8190a6b97f50e88891f2 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:02 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:50 a.m.