Triple
T33948164
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States Circuit Court for the District of Virginia |
E870363
|
entity |
| Predicate | presidingJudgeInCase |
P92112
|
FINISHED |
| Object | John Marshall |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: John Marshall | Statement: [United States Circuit Court for the District of Virginia, presidingJudgeInCase, John Marshall]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: presidingJudgeInCase Context triple: [United States Circuit Court for the District of Virginia, presidingJudgeInCase, John Marshall]
-
A.
presidingJudgeFrom
Indicates that a particular judge is serving as the presiding judge in a case, proceeding, or jurisdiction originating from a specified place or institution.
-
B.
originatingJudge
Indicates the judge who initially handled or issued the original decision or order in a legal matter.
-
C.
presidingRole
Indicates that one entity holds an official position of authority or leadership over a proceeding, organization, or event involving another entity.
-
D.
hasPrincipalJudge
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as the main or presiding judge for another entity, such as a court or judicial body.
-
E.
legalCasePresided
Indicates that a particular legal case was overseen and directed by a specific judge or judicial authority.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3499b0dd48190b07b4b60babcee02 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f73ae120bc8190bff94d38d7a7a00d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:09 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f73a38d0848190aa5139144b8561c6 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:06 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:49 a.m.