Triple

T33940965
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Las firmezas de Isabela E870162 entity
Predicate usesPoeticLanguage P182632 FINISHED
Object highly metaphorical LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: highly metaphorical | Statement: [Las firmezas de Isabela, usesPoeticLanguage, highly metaphorical]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesPoeticLanguage
Context triple: [Las firmezas de Isabela, usesPoeticLanguage, highly metaphorical]
  • A. usedPoeticallyFor
    Indicates that one entity is employed in a poetic or figurative way to refer to or represent another entity.
  • B. usesPoeticProgram
    Indicates that one entity employs or applies a poetic program—such as a structured, rule-based, or stylistically poetic system—in relation to another entity or context.
  • C. poeticStyle
    Indicates the stylistic or formal manner in which something is expressed in poetry, such as its structure, tone, and linguistic features.
  • D. poeticDepiction chosen
    Indicates that one entity artistically represents or describes another using poetic or figurative language.
  • E. languageOfPoetry
    Indicates that a specified language is the language in which a given piece of poetry is written or expressed.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3499b0dd48190b07b4b60babcee02 completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fba78aca4c8190b8f1831e8cc04e06 completed May 6, 2026, 8:41 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fba34a65a4819088bac6c17542d71c completed May 6, 2026, 8:23 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:49 a.m.