Triple
T33928739
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | duc de Chartres |
E869826
|
entity |
| Predicate | precedenceInCourtHierarchy |
P192667
|
FINISHED |
| Object | below Duke of Orléans |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: below Duke of Orléans | Statement: [duc de Chartres, precedenceInCourtHierarchy, below Duke of Orléans]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: precedenceInCourtHierarchy Context triple: [duc de Chartres, precedenceInCourtHierarchy, below Duke of Orléans]
-
A.
precedenceInCourt
Indicates that one legal case, decision, or action is considered to have higher authority or priority over another within a court’s decision-making process.
-
B.
confersPrecedenceIn
Indicates that one entity is granted higher priority, rank, or standing over another within a specified context or domain.
-
C.
hasCourtPrecedence
Indicates that one court decision or ruling holds authoritative priority over another in legal reasoning or application.
-
D.
hierarchyInLegalSystem
Indicates that one legal authority, norm, or institution holds a higher or lower rank relative to another within a structured legal system.
-
E.
precedentSystem
Indicates that one legal system or framework serves as a source of precedent or authoritative guidance for another system.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3499a59788190bff762a891471b31 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd231cab588190ad0953dc8f4af8f2 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 11:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd1aa3f1c481909fe6e9cab1383551 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 11:05 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fd231bdd108190900369e07c854e95 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 11:41 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:49 a.m.