Triple

T3392580
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Article I – General Provisions E71453 entity
Predicate scopeDefinedIn P13667 FINISHED
Object Rule 101 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Rule 101 | Statement: [Article I – General Provisions, scopeDefinedIn, Rule 101]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: scopeDefinedIn
Context triple: [Article I – General Provisions, scopeDefinedIn, Rule 101]
  • A. scopeDefinedBy chosen
    Indicates that the extent or boundaries of one entity’s applicability, influence, or validity are determined or constrained by another entity.
  • B. scopeOfDeclaration
    Indicates the syntactic region or context within which a particular declaration is valid and can be referenced.
  • C. areDefinedIn
    Indicates that the referenced entities are specified, described, or formally established within a particular source, context, or scope.
  • D. scopeType
    Indicates the specific range, level, or context within which a given relationship, rule, or action is defined or applies.
  • E. scopeDefault
    Indicates that something applies or is valid in the absence of a more specific or overriding scope.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85a9c4a88190a854019341cb3b60 completed March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adb851e57c8190983cadcedc58db50 completed March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69adadf705608190975423779430cc58 completed March 8, 2026, 5:12 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:14 p.m.