Triple

T33873693
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bad Blake E868292 entity
Predicate hasMaritalHistory P94899 FINISHED
Object multiple failed marriages LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: multiple failed marriages | Statement: [Bad Blake, hasMaritalHistory, multiple failed marriages]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMaritalHistory
Context triple: [Bad Blake, hasMaritalHistory, multiple failed marriages]
  • A. characterMaritalHistory chosen
    Indicates a relationship that records the sequence of a character’s past and present marital relationships, including spouses and relevant time periods.
  • B. hasMarriage
    Indicates a marital relationship exists between the two entities, specifying that they are or were legally married to each other.
  • C. hasMaritalStatusAtEnd
    Indicates that an entity possesses a specific marital status at the end of a given period, event, or reference time.
  • D. hasCivilStatus
    Indicates the civil or marital status that applies to a person or entity (e.g., single, married, divorced).
  • E. hasMaritalRelationshipType
    Indicates the specific type or nature of the marital relationship that exists between two entities.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f34995029081909ede0f7df73d1a5e completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a01487b73488190954eb5143e6f246e completed May 11, 2026, 3:09 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0145210ae481908da59b02efdbc397 completed May 11, 2026, 2:55 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:47 a.m.