Triple
T33862186
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Scottish devolution |
E867952
|
entity |
| Predicate | transfersPowerFrom |
P173782
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Parliament of the United Kingdom |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Parliament of the United Kingdom | Statement: [Scottish devolution, transfersPowerFrom, Parliament of the United Kingdom]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: transfersPowerFrom Context triple: [Scottish devolution, transfersPowerFrom, Parliament of the United Kingdom]
-
A.
transferredPowerTo
Indicates that one entity has passed control, authority, or energy to another entity.
-
B.
derivesPowerFrom
chosen
Indicates that one entity obtains or is granted its power, authority, or energy as a result of another entity.
-
C.
usesPowerFor
Indicates that one entity applies or exploits a particular power, energy, or capability for a specific purpose or activity.
-
D.
inPower
Indicates that one entity currently holds governing authority, control, or leadership over a group, organization, or domain.
-
E.
reservesPowerTo
Indicates that one party retains or explicitly keeps for itself the authority or right to exercise a particular power or function, rather than granting it to others.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349943ccc8190a3c41a3e0ae46cbf |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff109695008190a22b47ef8be2e3f9 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 10:46 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff0f243ea88190970d2c520b55c816 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:47 a.m.