Triple
T33845169
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Zimbabwean parliamentary election, 1995 |
E867459
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalStatusOfOpposition |
P199544
|
FINISHED |
| Object | formally legal but constrained |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: formally legal but constrained | Statement: [Zimbabwean parliamentary election, 1995, legalStatusOfOpposition, formally legal but constrained]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalStatusOfOpposition Context triple: [Zimbabwean parliamentary election, 1995, legalStatusOfOpposition, formally legal but constrained]
-
A.
oppositionStatus
Indicates that one entity’s stance, condition, or role is characterized by being against, resisting, or in conflict with another entity, proposal, or situation.
-
B.
legalStatusDebatedBy
Indicates that the legal status of an entity is the subject of dispute, discussion, or controversy among parties or authorities.
-
C.
opposedLawType
Indicates that one law is opposed to, or in conflict with, another law of a specified type.
-
D.
canOppose
Indicates that one entity has the ability or capacity to resist, counteract, or act in opposition to another entity or its actions.
-
E.
legalStatusAffirmedIn
Indicates that an entity’s legal status has been formally confirmed or upheld within a specified legal jurisdiction, document, or proceeding.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349937b648190a34ada70f6a2b534 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff41645c548190b7cb4e53079b93ef |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:15 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff410aa33c8190869ba769ac2a93ce |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:13 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ff4163a8548190b0eaafd0a377b141 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:14 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:47 a.m.