Triple
T33818153
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Garry Lejeune |
E866747
|
entity |
| Predicate | performsInPlayWithinPlay |
P57727
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Nothing On |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Nothing On | Statement: [Garry Lejeune, performsInPlayWithinPlay, Nothing On]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: performsInPlayWithinPlay Context triple: [Garry Lejeune, performsInPlayWithinPlay, Nothing On]
-
A.
directsPlayWithinPlay
Indicates that one entity is responsible for directing a theatrical performance that occurs as a play within another play.
-
B.
performedPlayBy
chosen
Indicates that a theatrical play or performance was carried out or enacted by a particular person or group.
-
C.
containsPlayWithinPlay
Indicates that one play or dramatic work includes another play performed or depicted within its own narrative.
-
D.
settingWithinPlay
Indicates that a particular setting (such as a location or environment) occurs within and is part of a specific play.
-
E.
isInPlayBy
Indicates that an entity is currently active or participating within a game, scenario, or context as a result of actions taken by a specific agent or player.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349911a8c81908478662194b23d8c |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fea2d0a4d08190aa06aeb902a02d5a |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:58 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fea24698348190b9b992a8e7cdbcd0 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:56 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:46 a.m.