Triple
T33798027
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sound Charades |
E866128
|
entity |
| Predicate | clueStyle |
P48733
|
FINISHED |
| Object | narrative sketches ending in a pun |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: narrative sketches ending in a pun | Statement: [Sound Charades, clueStyle, narrative sketches ending in a pun]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: clueStyle Context triple: [Sound Charades, clueStyle, narrative sketches ending in a pun]
-
A.
logicStyle
Indicates how an entity’s reasoning, argumentation, or inference process is structured or conducted.
-
B.
riftStyle
Indicates a stylistic or design relationship characterized by features associated with a “rift” (such as a split, fracture, or division) between entities.
-
C.
styleFor
Indicates a relationship where one entity defines, specifies, or is used as the style or styling configuration applied to another entity.
-
D.
styleTendsTo
Indicates that one style is generally inclined or likely to develop, appear, or be adopted in the direction of another style.
-
E.
styleDescribedAs
chosen
Indicates that the manner, aesthetic, or mode of something is characterized or labeled using a particular style description.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3498f99f481909cb271f4965a7594 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6ffbad8848190867c2988c0ceb84f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:56 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6fc59518081908b0275f47721d561 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:42 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:46 a.m.