Triple
T33778872
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Atwot |
E865596
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasNumberMarkingOnNouns |
P11612
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Atwot, hasNumberMarkingOnNouns, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNumberMarkingOnNouns Context triple: [Atwot, hasNumberMarkingOnNouns, true]
-
A.
hasCaseMarking
Indicates that a linguistic element (such as a noun or pronoun) bears a specific grammatical case marking that signals its syntactic or semantic role in a clause.
-
B.
hasNounClassSystem
Indicates that an entity possesses a grammatical system in which nouns are categorized into distinct classes that affect their agreement with other elements in the language.
-
C.
hasNominalMorphology
Indicates that an entity possesses a system of nominal morphology, such as inflectional or derivational markers on nouns.
-
D.
hasGrammaticalNumber
chosen
Indicates that an expression is associated with a specific grammatical number category (such as singular, plural, or dual) in a language.
-
E.
hasNoun
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a specific noun as an attribute, label, or grammatical component.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3498df6f88190bf9647ea4e4a956e |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe831c97c88190b27ecf100e25c2a0 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 12:43 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe7f1b92648190b14e56bcaee5d0ca |
completed | May 9, 2026, 12:26 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:45 a.m.