Triple
T33778005
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lembus |
E865572
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | variety of the Tugen language |
C60526
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: variety of the Tugen language Context triple: [Lembus, instanceOf, variety of the Tugen language]
-
A.
variety of the Tigre language
A variety of the Tigre language is a regional or social form of Tigre distinguished by systematic differences in pronunciation, vocabulary, or grammar while remaining mutually intelligible with other forms.
-
B.
variety of Mwaghavul language
A variety of the Mwaghavul language is a distinct regional or social form of Mwaghavul characterized by systematic differences in pronunciation, vocabulary, and/or grammar within the broader Mwaghavul-speaking community.
-
C.
variety of the Isnag language
A variety of the Isnag language is a regional or social form of Isnag distinguished by systematic differences in pronunciation, vocabulary, or grammar while remaining mutually intelligible with other forms.
-
D.
variety of Wapishana language
A variety of the Wapishana language is a distinct regional or social form of Wapishana, characterized by unique phonological, lexical, or grammatical features while remaining mutually intelligible with other forms.
-
E.
Tswa–Ronga language variety
A Tswa–Ronga language variety is a specific regional or social form of the Tswa–Ronga language cluster, characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, and grammatical features shared by its speakers.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3498df6f88190bf9647ea4e4a956e |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:45 a.m.