Triple
T33772164
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | C'est le dernier qui a parlé qui a raison |
E865407
|
entity |
| Predicate | performedInFinal |
P23986
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [C'est le dernier qui a parlé qui a raison, performedInFinal, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: performedInFinal Context triple: [C'est le dernier qui a parlé qui a raison, performedInFinal, yes]
-
A.
playedInFinals
chosen
Indicates that an entity participated as a competitor or player in the final round of a competition or tournament.
-
B.
hasFinale
Indicates that one entity serves as the concluding or final part (such as an ending segment, episode, or event) of another entity.
-
C.
isFinalsOf
Indicates that one entity represents the final or concluding stage, round, or version of another entity.
-
D.
finalFilmPerformanceOf
Indicates that one entity is the last film performance or role undertaken by the other entity before they stopped acting in films.
-
E.
hasFinalRound
Indicates that an event, process, or competition includes a concluding or decisive final round.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3498df6f88190bf9647ea4e4a956e |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe9b0276d48190b554fa22b043e6d8 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:25 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe999692b081909921e1148d66f0ef |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:19 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:45 a.m.